EMPLOYEES OR INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
(cont.)
In order to determine
the status of a worker and the payments made for services
one must first understand the possible relationships
creating the status. These, simply stated, are: 1.
independent contractor, 2. common law employee, 3.
statutory employee and 4. statutory non-employee.
Most courts and the IRS apply this criteria.
Laws declaring an individual to be or not to be your
employee determine the statutory versus non-statutory
issue. One may not be an employee under common law
but by statute they are considered such and vice versa.
A full time licensed insurance agent working for one
insurance company is generally a statutory employee.
However, a licensed real estate broker contracting
to sell your home would not by statute be your employee.
The IRS and the courts do not generally
consider the statutory and statutory non-employee
in the context of our discussion and it will not be
discussed further. Our focus will be on the rules
and criteria distinguishing “employees”
and “independent contractors” from each
other.
State government agencies sometimes
apply the ABC test to determine employee versus independent
contractor status. If you meet all of the following
criteria you are an independent contractor, if not,
you are an employee:
1. The worker controls and directs
the performance of the service from a contractual
standpoint and “in fact.” (The “in
fact” concept is where the one generally fails
the test.)
2. The service being performed is either outside the
normal business of or outside the place of business
of the business for which it is being performed.
3. The worker is performing services for others or
clearly has an independent trade, occupation, profession
or business.
This is also referred to as the “Economic
Reality Test” and is included in the Twenty
Factors Test of the IRS and the courts’ interpretation
of employment status. This test is fairly limited
to the agencies applying the test, and we will only
further consider the more frequently applied tests
of the courts and IRS.
The first factor considered by courts
and the IRS is “do you control/direct only the
result of the work done by the worker or do you control
the means and methods of accomplishing the result.”
For example: You, the general contractor on an apartment
complex with 10 buildings, hire a roofer. He estimates
220 man-hours at $20 per hour. You agree to a mobilization
fee of 10%, 8% of the total upon completion of each
building and a 10% holdback until after inspection.
You are controlling the result, not the means and
method, and the roofer is an independent contractor.
...Previous
Page
Next Page...
|